How to use QLoRA to Fine tune LLama2 with your own data

Featured image

Welcome !

Before we begin: A note on OOM errors

If you get an error like this: OutOfMemoryError: CUDA out of memory, tweak your parameters to make the model less computationally intensive. I will help guide you through that in this guide.

To re-try after you tweak your parameters, open a Terminal (‘Launcher’ or ‘+’ in the nav bar above -> Other -> Terminal) and run the command nvidia-smi. Then find the process ID PID under Processes and run the command kill [PID]. You will need to re-start your notebook from the beginning. (There may be a better way to do this… if so please do let me know!)

Let’s begin!

I used a GPU and dev environment from brev.dev. Provision a pre-configured GPU in one click here (a single A10G or L4 should be enough for this dataset; anything with >= 24GB GPU Memory. You may need more GPUs and/or Memory if your sequence max_length is larger than 512). Once you’ve checked out your machine and landed in your instance page, select the specs you’d like (I used Python 3.10 and CUDA 12.0.1) and click the “Build” button to build your Verb container. Give this a few minutes.

A few minutes after your model has started Running, click the ‘Notebook’ button on the top right of your screen once it illuminates (you may need to refresh the screen). You will be taken to a Jupyter Lab environment, where you can upload this Notebook.

Note: You can connect your cloud credits (AWS or GCP) by clicking “Org: “ on the top right, and in the panel that slides over, click “Connect AWS” or “Connect GCP” under “Connect your cloud” and follow the instructions linked to attach your credentials.


!pip install -q -U bitsandbytes
!pip install -q -U git+https://github.com/huggingface/transformers.git
!pip install -q -U git+https://github.com/huggingface/peft.git
!pip install -q -U git+https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate.git
!pip install -q -U datasets scipy ipywidgets matplotlib

0. Accelerator

Set up the Accelerator. I’m not sure if we really need this for a QLoRA given its description (I have to read more about it) but it seems it can’t hurt, and it’s helpful to have the code for future reference. You can always comment out the accelerator if you want to try without.

from accelerate import FullyShardedDataParallelPlugin, Accelerator
from torch.distributed.fsdp.fully_sharded_data_parallel import FullOptimStateDictConfig, FullStateDictConfig

fsdp_plugin = FullyShardedDataParallelPlugin(
    state_dict_config=FullStateDictConfig(offload_to_cpu=True, rank0_only=False),
    optim_state_dict_config=FullOptimStateDictConfig(offload_to_cpu=True, rank0_only=False),
)

accelerator = Accelerator(fsdp_plugin=fsdp_plugin)

1. Load Dataset

Here’s where you load your own data. You want the data formatted in a .jsonl file, structured something like this:

Preparing data

To prepare your dataset for loading, all you need is a .jsonl file structured something like this:

{"input": "What color is the sky?", "output": "The sky is blue."}
{"input": "Where is the best place to get cloud GPUs?", "output": "Brev.dev"}

If you choose to model your data as input/output pairs, you’ll want to use something like the second formatting_func below, which will will combine all your features into one input string.

from datasets import load_dataset

train_dataset = load_dataset('json', data_files='notes.jsonl', split='train')
eval_dataset = load_dataset('json', data_files='notes_validation.jsonl', split='train')

Formatting prompts

Then create a formatting_func to structure training examples as prompts. In my case, my data was just notes like this:

{"note": "note-for-model-to-predict"}
{"note": "note-for-model-to-predict-1"}
{"note": "note-for-model-to-predict-2"}

So the formatting_func I used was:

def formatting_func(example):
    text = f"### The following is a note by Eevee the Dog: {example['note']}"
    return text

def formatting_func(example):
    text = f"### Question: {example['input']}\n ### Answer: {example['output']}"
    return text

2. Load Base Model

Let’s now load Llama 2 7B - meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf - using 4-bit quantization!

import torch
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM, BitsAndBytesConfig

base_model_id = "meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf"
bnb_config = BitsAndBytesConfig(
    load_in_4bit=True,
    bnb_4bit_use_double_quant=True,
    bnb_4bit_quant_type="nf4",
    bnb_4bit_compute_dtype=torch.bfloat16
)

model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(base_model_id, quantization_config=bnb_config)

3. Tokenization

Set up the tokenizer. Add padding on the left as it makes training use less memory.

For model_max_length, it’s helpful to get a distribution of your data lengths. Let’s first tokenize without the truncation/padding, so we can get a length distribution.

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(
    base_model_id,
    padding_side="left",
    add_eos_token=True,
    add_bos_token=True,
)
tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token

def generate_and_tokenize_prompt(prompt):
    return tokenizer(formatting_func(prompt))

Reformat the prompt and tokenize each sample:

tokenized_train_dataset = train_dataset.map(generate_and_tokenize_prompt)
tokenized_val_dataset = eval_dataset.map(generate_and_tokenize_prompt)

Let’s get a distribution of our dataset lengths, so we can determine the appropriate max_length for our input tensors.

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

def plot_data_lengths(tokenize_train_dataset, tokenized_val_dataset):
    lengths = [len(x['input_ids']) for x in tokenized_train_dataset]
    lengths += [len(x['input_ids']) for x in tokenized_val_dataset]
    print(len(lengths))

    
    plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
    plt.hist(lengths, bins=20, alpha=0.7, color='blue')
    plt.xlabel('Length of input_ids')
    plt.ylabel('Frequency')
    plt.title('Distribution of Lengths of input_ids')
    plt.show()

plot_data_lengths(tokenized_train_dataset, tokenized_val_dataset)

From here, you can choose where you’d like to set the max_length to be. You can truncate and pad training examples to fit them to your chosen size. Be aware that choosing a larger max_length has its compute tradeoffs.

I’m using my personal notes to train the model, and they vary greatly in length. I spent some time cleaning the dataset so the samples were about the same length, cutting up individual notes if needed, but being sure to not cut in the middle of a word or sentence.

Now let’s tokenize again with padding and truncation, and set up the tokenize function to make labels and input_ids the same. This is basically what self-supervised fine-tuning is.

max_length = 512 

def generate_and_tokenize_prompt2(prompt):
    result = tokenizer(
        formatting_func(prompt),
        truncation=True,
        max_length=max_length,
        padding="max_length",
    )
    result["labels"] = result["input_ids"].copy()
    return result

tokenized_train_dataset = train_dataset.map(generate_and_tokenize_prompt2)
tokenized_val_dataset = eval_dataset.map(generate_and_tokenize_prompt2)

Check that input_ids is padded on the left with the eos_token (2) and there is an eos_token 2 added to the end, and the prompt starts with a bos_token (1).

print(tokenized_train_dataset[1]['input_ids'])

Now all the samples should be the same length, max_length.

plot_data_lengths(tokenized_train_dataset, tokenized_val_dataset)

How does the base model do?

Optionally, you can check how Llama 2 7B does on one of your data samples. For example, if you have a dataset of users’ biometric data to their health scores, you could test the following eval_prompt:

eval_prompt = """ Given the following biometric data, score the users' health, from 0-100.

### Biometric Data:
Temperature=98.2,
Sex=F,
Age=29,
Height=69 inches,
Weight=160 lbs,
V02_Max=55,
HRV=55

### Health Score:
"""

The eval_prompt I used was:

eval_prompt = " The following is a note by Eevee the Dog: # "

model_input = tokenizer(eval_prompt, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")

model.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
    print(tokenizer.decode(model.generate(**model_input, max_new_tokens=256, pad_token_id=2)[0], skip_special_tokens=True))

Observe how the model does out of the box.

4. Set Up LoRA

Now, to start our fine-tuning, we have to apply some preprocessing to the model to prepare it for training. For that use the prepare_model_for_kbit_training method from PEFT.

from peft import prepare_model_for_kbit_training

model.gradient_checkpointing_enable()
model = prepare_model_for_kbit_training(model)

def print_trainable_parameters(model):
    """
    Prints the number of trainable parameters in the model.
    """
    trainable_params = 0
    all_param = 0
    for _, param in model.named_parameters():
        all_param += param.numel()
        if param.requires_grad:
            trainable_params += param.numel()
    print(
        f"trainable params: {trainable_params} || all params: {all_param} || trainable%: {100 * trainable_params / all_param}"
    )

Let’s print the model to examine its layers, as we will apply QLoRA to all the linear layers of the model. Those layers are q_proj, k_proj, v_proj, o_proj, gate_proj, up_proj, down_proj, and lm_head.

print(model)

Here we define the LoRA config.

r is the rank of the low-rank matrix used in the adapters, which thus controls the number of parameters trained. A higher rank will allow for more expressivity, but there is a compute tradeoff.

alpha is the scaling factor for the learned weights. The weight matrix is scaled by alpha/r, and thus a higher value for alpha assigns more weight to the LoRA activations.

The values used in the QLoRA paper were r=64 and lora_alpha=16, and these are said to generalize well, but we will use r=32 and lora_alpha=64 so that we have more emphasis on the new fine-tuned data while also reducing computational complexity.

from peft import LoraConfig, get_peft_model

config = LoraConfig(
    r=32,
    lora_alpha=64,
    target_modules=[
        "q_proj",
        "k_proj",
        "v_proj",
        "o_proj",
        "gate_proj",
        "up_proj",
        "down_proj",
        "lm_head",
    ],
    bias="none",
    lora_dropout=0.05,  
    task_type="CAUSAL_LM",
)

model = get_peft_model(model, config)
print_trainable_parameters(model)


model = accelerator.prepare_model(model)

See how the model looks different now, with the LoRA adapters added:

print(model)

Let’s use Weights & Biases to track our training metrics. You’ll need to apply an API key when prompted. Feel free to skip this if you’d like, and just comment out the wandb parameters in the Trainer definition below.

!pip install -q wandb -U

import wandb, os
wandb.login()

wandb_project = "journal-finetune"
if len(wandb_project) > 0:
    os.environ["WANDB_PROJECT"] = wandb_project

5. Run Training!

I didn’t have a lot of training samples, so I used only 500 steps. I found that the end product worked well.

A note on training. You can set the max_steps to be high initially, and examine at what step your model’s performance starts to degrade. There is where you’ll find a sweet spot for how many steps to perform. For example, say you start with 1000 steps, and find that at around 500 steps the model starts overfitting - the validation loss goes up (bad) while the training loss goes down significantly, meaning the model is learning the training set really well, but is unable to generalize to new datapoints. Therefore, 500 steps would be your sweet spot, so you would use the checkpoint-500 model repo in your output dir (llama2-7b-journal-finetune) as your final model in step 6 below.

You can interrupt the process via Kernel -> Interrupt Kernel in the top nav bar once you realize you didn’t need to train anymore.

if torch.cuda.device_count() > 1: 
    model.is_parallelizable = True
    model.model_parallel = True

import transformers
from datetime import datetime

project = "journal-finetune"
base_model_name = "llama2-7b"
run_name = base_model_name + "-" + project
output_dir = "./" + run_name

tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token

trainer = transformers.Trainer(
    model=model,
    train_dataset=tokenized_train_dataset,
    eval_dataset=tokenized_val_dataset,
    args=transformers.TrainingArguments(
        output_dir=output_dir,
        warmup_steps=1,
        per_device_train_batch_size=2,
        gradient_accumulation_steps=1,
        max_steps=500,
        learning_rate=2.5e-5, 
        bf16=True,
        optim="paged_adamw_8bit",
        logging_dir="./logs",        
        save_strategy="steps",       
        save_steps=50,                
        evaluation_strategy="steps", 
        eval_steps=50,               
        do_eval=True,                
        report_to="wandb",           
        run_name=f"{run_name}-{datetime.now().strftime('%Y-%m-%d-%H-%M')}"          
    ),
    data_collator=transformers.DataCollatorForLanguageModeling(tokenizer, mlm=False),
)

model.config.use_cache = False  
trainer.train()

6. Drum Roll… Try the Trained Model!

It’s a good idea to kill the current process so that you don’t run out of memory loading the base model again on top of the model we just trained. Go to Kernel > Restart Kernel or kill the process via the Terminal (nvidia smi > kill [PID]).

By default, the PEFT library will only save the QLoRA adapters, so we need to first load the base Llama 2 7B model from the Huggingface Hub:

import torch
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM, BitsAndBytesConfig

base_model_id = "meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf"

base_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
    base_model_id,  
    quantization_config=bnb_config,  
    device_map="auto",
    trust_remote_code=True
)

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(base_model_id, add_bos_token=True, trust_remote_code=True)

Now load the QLoRA adapter from the appropriate checkpoint directory, i.e. the best performing model checkpoint:

from peft import PeftModel

ft_model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base_model, "llama2-7b-journal-finetune/checkpoint-500")

and run your inference!

Let’s try the same eval_prompt and thus model_input as above, and see if the new finetuned model performs better.

eval_prompt = " The following is a note by Eevee the Dog, which doesn't share anything too personal: # "
model_input = tokenizer(eval_prompt, return_tensors="pt").to("cuda")

ft_model.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
    print(tokenizer.decode(ft_model.generate(**model_input, max_new_tokens=300)[0], skip_special_tokens=True))